Comment on article “Obama gives coal miners the boot”
Citation for original article:
4/6/2012
The Obama anti-coal stance is based on the thin air of the carbon dioxide hoax. Once more we have a lawyer diddling with science, always a prescription for disaster, and in Jackson a rabid environmentalist who not only does not care what she is doing to the economy, she is actively pursuing its destruction through reducing our power systems to third-world levels of blackouts and unreliable service. IF you do not have reliable power 100% of the time you do not run good manufacturing plants, good assembly plants or data farms; you just go out of business.
The EPA is regulating 50% of the coal-fired power plants out of existence. Considering they provide 50% of the nation’s reliable electric power, this means EPA Chief Jackson and El President Obama are removing 25% of the reliable power from the grid. This translates to thousands of industries and millions of jobs going off to never-never land.
What is galling is the Republican House lets the EPA get away with their power grab and does not put the financial squeeze on them .
Congress moreover has the power to outlaw EPA (and the cabal of other global-warming-promoting agencies) from any actions based on regulating carbon emissions. Why does Congress sit on its hands while these agencies are running amuck, setting American industry up for a fall, and the loss of millions more jobs? Why?
Is the house leadership having too many golf games with the president?
June 17, 2012 at 4:58 pm |
To jhelp in reducing deficit and budget, two agencies can be eliminated EPA AND DEA which prohibits industrial hemp which can triple ethanol production w/o usind food products also woul end prohibition $50 B a year or more plus all the jobs and new industries that would emerge saving trees for paper to clean air of CO2 The FDA COULD BE TRIMMED ALSO.
June 23, 2012 at 9:03 am |
William – I see where you are going, but basically I see no problem with CO2, but I do see a huge economic problem with the anti-CO2 religion. It is a global economic disaster, a tsunami which has not yet hit us full blast, but it is coming.